Coding Workflow
Strong fitUse Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for coding workflow when you want fast execution, medium ease of use, and high output quality.
Coding & app building
By devin.ai
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is a strong fit for agentic coding workflows, with a profile optimized for intermediate users who value medium ease-of-use and high output quality.
Best for: Agentic coding workflows
Cognition-owned AI coding environment, formerly Windsurf, combining the same IDE with a Devin agent command center for editor-native development and agentic implementation workflows.
In Choosely terms, this sits in the coding & app building lane and is commonly selected for agentic coding workflows and ide-native development.
Starts around $20/mo
Check official pricingDevin Desktop is the new name for Windsurf. New subscriptions include Free at US$0, Pro at US$20/month, Max at US$200/month, and Teams at US$80/month plus US$40/full developer seat/month. Paid plans have daily and weekly usage allowances; extra usage is charged at API rates. Existing Windsurf plans and pricing carry over, including unchanged legacy enterprise plans. Enterprise pricing is custom.
Why people pick it
Where it falls short
A strong match when your main priority is agentic coding workflows and you need an intermediate-friendly starting point.
Useful when your team values medium ease of use and fast execution over heavier setup.
Best when high quality matters, but you still want a practical workflow rather than a complex implementation track.
Compare with similar tools
Compare Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) vs Cursor
Cursor and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) are both developer-oriented AI coding environments; Cursor leans into AI-native editor workflows, while Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) emphasizes an IDE-native agentic workflow with Devin-connected context.
Compare Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) vs GitHub Copilot
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) fits teams that want an agentic AI coding workspace with IDE-native context and implementation loops; GitHub Copilot fits teams that want a lighter-weight coding assistant inside existing developer workflows.
Compare Windsurf vs Bolt
Windsurf fits an agentic AI coding workspace for implementation and repo-oriented development; Bolt fits fast browser-based AI app generation when speed to a prototype matters more than owning a full coding environment.
Practical ways Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) fits the current Choosely catalog profile.
Use Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for coding workflow when you want fast execution, medium ease of use, and high output quality.
Use Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for agentic build when you want fast execution, medium ease of use, and high output quality.
Use Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for preview app when you want fast execution, medium ease of use, and high output quality.
Use Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for developer environment when you want fast execution, medium ease of use, and high output quality.
Use Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) for ship code when you want fast execution, medium ease of use, and high output quality.
Cursor
AI-native coding workspace for developers using Cursor 3-style agent workflows, multi-repo context, debugging help, and hands-on implementation control.
Choose Cursor when your primary need is developer-led app building.
GitHub Copilot
AI coding assistant that helps developers write, edit, and understand code inside their workflow.
Choose GitHub Copilot when your primary need is coding faster.
Start with one feature or screen, use the preview loop aggressively, and keep reviewing the generated changes.
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) is best for agentic coding workflows, ide-native development, repo and implementation loops.
This catalog profile lists Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) at intermediate skill level with medium ease of use.
Still aimed at people who can review code